Field refSN 48REC-819Soil & Nutrition

Half a Pound of Protein: The Winter Number Kansas Cow Herds Need

K-State's Jason Warner says half to one pound of daily supplemental protein typically sustains late-gestation cows on dormant Kansas pasture this winter.

Entered
Plot
1.8 ha
Record
712 words
Walk-through
4 min

DrillSprayHarvestPlanning window

Protein supplements help cows maintain body condition through winter
Protein supplements help cows maintain body condition through winterDesertrose7 / pixabay

Agronomist’s notes

  • Late-gestation cows need about 1.6–2.5 lb of total dietary protein per head daily.
  • Half to one pound of supplemental protein per day is normally adequate for late-gestation cows.
  • Dry distillers grains at $225/ton and 30% crude protein equal $750/ton of protein; wheat middlings at $250/ton and 17% equal about $1,471/ton.
  • K-State's Jason Warner says protein is the most limiting nutrient on low-quality dormant forages.

Late-gestation cows need roughly 1.6 to 2.5 pounds of total dietary protein per head daily, and Kansas State University cow-calf specialist Jason Warner says half to a full pound of supplemental protein on top of grazing normally covers that gap. With Kansas pastures entering dormancy, he is urging spring-calving herds to start planning supplementation now to hold body condition through winter.

The reason is straightforward. Dormant native grasses lose protein content, and that decline restricts digestion.

"When we think about our low-quality forages, protein often is the most limiting nutrient for (cattle)," Warner said. "We see really nice responses to protein supplementation when we offer that to those cows that are grazing low-quality forages."

Protein requirements for spring-calving cows run relatively low in early fall, then climb steadily as calving approaches. Warner advised producers to judge their program on average across the whole feeding period, not on any single day.

"When we think about trying to maintain protein in the diet of a cow so that it can have adequate forage digestion to get enough energy from forage that the cow consumes, it is important to remember our goal of meeting her needs on average across the feeding period," Warner said.

Which delivery method fits the operation?

Supplement options split into two broad camps: self-fed products such as lick tubs or blocks, and supplements delivered by feeding equipment or by hand. The right choice depends on pasture locations, available resources and how often a producer can reach the cattle.

"A self-fed supplement that's provided through a lick tub or a trough might be a good fit if it is difficult for producers to provide supplement to the herd on a daily or even every other day basis," Warner said.

Herds closer to feeding facilities suit a pickup-mounted cake feeder or a feed mixer. Warner stressed that the delivery form matters less than the nutrient itself.

"There is a lot of flexibility with how these products can look," Warner said. "When we think about protein, it's the nutrient. We're thinking about supplying the nutrient for the cow herd, and the way that it can be delivered can take a lot of different forms."

What does the supplement actually need to do?

Warner framed the goal narrowly: maintain forage intake and body condition, not simply push more feed into the system. Protein improves how cows handle rough forage.

"Bringing protein into the system improves forage intake on low-quality forages very strongly and consistently," he said.

The starting point is a forage test. Producers should evaluate the nutritional value of available forage alongside the cow's stage of production before settling on a supplementation rate.

How should producers compare protein prices?

Cattle prices have stayed favorable despite recent market volatility, but Warner said controlling supplementation expense remains central to profitability. The comparison that matters is cost per unit of protein, not price per ton at the feedyard gate.

The calculation is simple: divide a supplement's price per ton by its crude protein concentration expressed as a decimal.

Two examples show why the method matters:

  • Dry distillers grains at $225 per ton with 30% crude protein cost $750 per ton on a 100% crude protein basis.
  • Wheat middlings at $250 per ton with 17% crude protein cost roughly $1,471 per ton on the same basis.

The distillers grains carry a lower sticker price and deliver protein at less than half the unit cost of the wheat middlings. Warner said this arithmetic lets producers judge value even when purchase prices sit close together.

"Pricing feedstuffs this way allows you to compare supplements on an apples-to-apples basis by equalizing the amount of protein delivered," Warner said. "The straight cost of the nutrient can vary a lot depending on how it's packaged."

His bottom line for producers: maximize the forage base first, then buy the supplement that meets herd requirements at the lowest cost per unit of protein. Guidance on beef cattle nutrition and supplementation is available online from K-State Extension and from local extension offices across Kansas.

Producers should test forage and price supplements on a protein-unit basis before dormancy tightens the grazing gap this winter.

via extension.k-state.edu (Original)

Share this article:

More from Tom Whitfield

Tom Whitfield

Show full bio

Staff writer covering regulation, policy and their impact on production farming and field operations at Arable Wire.

189 articles

Nearby records

« Earlier record