Field refYN 66REC-604Machinery & Equipment

New Jersey Bill A2753 Would Put Farm Equipment Safety Into Driver Education

New Jersey's bipartisan bill A2753 would add farm equipment safety to driver education after data showed 80% of farm machinery crashes involve passenger vehicles.

Entered
Plot
1.6 ha
Record
660 words
Walk-through
3 min

DrillSprayHarvestCurrent stage

Bill to teach drivers about sharing the road with farm equipment in the works - Farms.com
Bill to teach drivers about sharing the road with farm equipment in the works - Farms.comAlexas_Fotos / pixabay

Agronomist’s notes

  • New Jersey bill A2753 would put farm equipment safety into classroom driver education and materials for parents of drivers under 18.
  • A 2007 study of 10 years of data found more than 80 percent of farm machinery crashes involved a non-farm vehicle.
  • Michigan State Police recorded more than 100 farm equipment crashes in 2026.
  • Farm machinery typically travels at 25 mph or less and displays the SMV triangle.
  • The bill was announced in an Oct. 22 NJ Assembly GOP statement.

More than 80 percent of crashes involving farm machinery also involve a non-farm passenger or commercial vehicle, according to a 2007 study of a decade of roadway collision data. That statistic sits at the centre of New Jersey bill A2753, a bipartisan measure now in the works that would teach drivers how to share the road with tractors, balers and other slow-moving farm equipment.

The bill, announced in an Oct. 22 statement from the NJ Assembly GOP, directs the state departments of agriculture and transportation to develop educational materials, including safety videos. Those materials would be posted online, at Motor Vehicle Commission (MVC) locations — the state's driver licensing and vehicle registration offices — and in additional public spaces.

The classroom is the second target. The bill would incorporate farm equipment safety into driver education courses and into the informational materials handed to parents of drivers under 18 who are just starting out behind the wheel.

What would the agriculture department actually do?

Beyond education, A2753 gives the New Jersey Department of Agriculture an analytical role. It directs the department to assess roadway risks involving farm equipment and to issue safety recommendations. In practice, that means the state would formally map where and how conflicts between cars and machinery occur, then translate those findings into guidance for both farmers and motorists.

What does the law already require?

New Jersey law already places specific obligations on motorists. Drivers approaching a slow-moving vehicle displaying the SMV triangle — the orange, reflective emblem marking vehicles travelling under 40 km/h — must reduce their speed before attempting to pass. The exception covers roads with at least two lanes travelling in the same direction.

Assemblywoman Dawn Fantasia, a sponsor of the bill, questioned how well those rules are understood. "How many drivers actually know that's the law? Or that farm equipment has a legal right to operate on public roads?" she said. "These machines are often wide, move at 25 miles per hour or less, and need additional room to turn. Impatience or a bad decision behind the wheel can have devastating consequences."

Her point is mechanical as much as legal. A tractor or combine moving at 25 mph occupies most or all of a rural lane, may swing wide to turn into a field gateway, and closes the distance to a following car far more slowly than drivers expect. The bill's bet is that drivers who understand those dynamics make fewer dangerous passing decisions.

How does New Jersey compare with other states?

Rules governing farm equipment on public roads vary sharply across the United States. Wisconsin offers one example: it is illegal there to pass farm equipment in designated no-passing zones, marked by a double yellow line or other signage. New Jersey's approach, if A2753 passes, would lean on education and risk assessment rather than new passing restrictions.

The crash data explains the urgency. The 2007 study, covering ten years of collision records, found that incidents involving farm machinery overwhelmingly involve a second vehicle rather than a solo farm accident. More recent figures point the same way: Michigan State Police data shows more than 100 crashes involving farm equipment have occurred in that state in 2026 alone.

For farmers, the stakes are direct. Every collision between a car and a tractor risks not only damage to a machine worth hundreds of thousands of dollars but injury to an operator who has limited protection in an open cab, and lost working days during narrow planting and harvest windows.

What happens next?

A2753 must pass both chambers of the New Jersey Legislature and receive the governor's signature before the departments of agriculture and transportation begin producing materials. Farmers and rural motorists in the state should watch committee scheduling in the coming session; the first tangible outputs would likely be the online safety videos and MVC location postings, followed by the agriculture department's roadway risk assessment and its safety recommendations.

via Google News: agricultural machinery (Source)

Share this article:

More from James Calloway

James Calloway

Show full bio

Correspondent covering regulation, policy and their impact on production farming and field operations at Arable Wire.

175 articles

Nearby records

« Earlier record